Your genre sucks! Thread: [1914]

Oldest postings 1 2 Newest postings

Post nr: 1981
Thread: [1914]
Author: Moorn (New name: Mister Saint) Posted: (7315 days ago) Previous in thread: 1977 by Ally
Subject: Trying yet again

Of course he didn't write his book to be read by twenty-first centruy anybody. He wrote it for people to read in his own day.

Next in thread: [1983]
 

Post nr: 1983
Thread: [1914]
Author: ally (New name: Ally) Posted: (7315 days ago) Previous in thread: 1981 by Mister Saint
Subject: Trying yet again

Yeah I kinda knew that ;) *is not entirely stupid*

Next in thread: [1984]
 

Post nr: 1984
Thread: [1914]
Author: Moorn (New name: Mister Saint) Posted: (7315 days ago) Previous in thread: 1983 by Ally
Subject: Trying yet again

Well, it is an interesting point after all, to think of how older works should be viewed. I've known of school systems in the U.S.A. that have banned works by Mark Twain from their libraries because the books contain the word nigger in several places. I personally don't think that is a justified practice, since at the time it was common speak in the States to refer to blacks that way. It doesn't do a book justice to judge it by modern standards.

Next in thread: [1986]
 

Post nr: 1986
Thread: [1914]
Author: Nightshadow (Check out Storyshop!) Posted: (7315 days ago) Previous in thread: 1984 by Mister Saint
Subject: Trying yet again

I had a research paper censored for a competition by an English teacher a couple of years ago. Because I used the word "negro," since that had been the appropriate terminology at the time I was writing about.

(She was probably involved in book-burnings, anyway, the nazi.)

Next in thread: [1989]
 

Post nr: 1989
Thread: [1914]
Author: Shining light Posted: (7315 days ago) Previous in thread: 1986 by Nightshadow
Subject: Trying yet again

How many years ago was a 'couple of years'? I don't remember a single time in my working memory of that word ever being acceptable... Sorry for my recent absence, by the way.

Next in thread: [1995], [1996]
 

Post nr: 1995
Thread: [1914]
Author: Moorn (New name: Mister Saint) Posted: (7315 days ago) Previous in thread: 1989 by Shining light
Subject: Trying yet again

...because that had been the appropriate terminology at the time I was writing about.

That kind was terminology was fluently employed and widely accepted in the United States from its adoption of slavery all the way up to the mid-twentieth century. 

 

Post nr: 1996
Thread: [1914]
Author: Nightshadow (Check out Storyshop!) Posted: (7314 days ago) Previous in thread: 1989 by Shining light
Subject: Trying yet again

A couple = two, last I checked. ;P And I know that. Like I said, in citing the paraphrased views of the time into my paper, I used the word "negro." Shame on me.

 

Post nr: 2051
Thread: [1914]
Author: PamelaT Posted: (7303 days ago) Previous in thread: 1942 by Mister Saint
Subject: Trying yet again

Romance novels blow. But as for the woman being the weaker sex..I don't know. I have mixed emotions on this subject. I like both aspects.  I have played many rpg characters that would kick the snot out of any man. I love to read adventurous tales of brave women who have taken up the sword to defend their family or their lands when the men have failed. 

But on the other hand, I tend to like the opposite better. Most of my favorite books involve women who are strong minded but rather weak in body. I just love the whole "damsel in distress" plot where the knight in shining armour saves the young maiden from certain doom. 

I guess that just makes me a sap, LOL

Next in thread: [2055]
 

Post nr: 2055
Thread: [1914]
Author: Moorn (New name: Mister Saint) Posted: (7303 days ago) Previous in thread: 2051 by PamelaT
Subject: Trying yet again

Kidding me? I love the damsel in distress plotline. To me your villain is never more potent than when a pretty, innocent, and defenseless virgin-type becomes the victim. But on the other side of the gender-coin (which doesn't work in soda machines, it turns out) most of the female characters I write or play are relatively if not exceptionally tough.

Maybe, like most things, Sophrosony is the key? (I think that's the right word) Moderation in all things?

Next in thread: [2059]
 

Post nr: 2059
Thread: [1914]
Author: PamelaT Posted: (7302 days ago) Previous in thread: 2055 by Mister Saint
Subject: Trying yet again

In my series of stories that I am compiling into one giganto novel, the main character is bordering evil when you first meet him. Then, in comes the heroine. You slowly see a change in him but he remains the badarse when it counts. The heroine is a simple girl who would just as likely faint at the sight of blood.

Next in thread: [2065]
 

Post nr: 2065
Thread: [1914]
Author: Shining light Posted: (7301 days ago) Previous in thread: 2059 by PamelaT
Subject: Trying yet again

that's a good idesa. i, too, evolve my characters as the swtory develops. The main character for the first book in my series is originaqlly very shy and introverted. By the end, however, due to a combination of the efforts of the heroine, and the heroine's parents, he end up heading a rebve;lion against the Kingdom, and therefore against his own father.

Next in thread: [2066]


News about Writersco
Help - How does Writersco work?