# of watchers: 26
2011-07-01 [Ash]: I think we are good on staff, I think when it gets to 25 to 1 memebers to staff then we should consider it.
2011-10-30 [sammie h!]: Well I am currently on the Council on cathug and just wanted to know if there is any jobs going on here, I have started a project on there since I got on the Council to make it a more interesting place and will do the same here, but it is up to the staff and all the crew
2011-10-30 [Ash]: We need to work on membership more sammie, so the more you can get people to Writersco, the more likely we'll be able to have another person in charge. :)
2011-11-01 [sammie h!]: I don't want to be in charge,I want to take it one step at a time, like priv - 89 first so I can prove myself with that, then up and up and up.
2011-11-01 [Annie]: Sammie, your priv will remain the same.
2011-11-01 [sammie h!]: What priv, I haven't got one
2011-11-01 [Ash]: If you prove yourself in time, you may move up to 99, which is a privileged member who can upload to wikis, but as I said, we need to work on having more members, not more staff. Thank you for your interest and wanting to support the WC but there simply isn't any more room for staff right now.
2011-11-02 [sammie h!]: Oh well, never mind, the privs are much easier on other heddate sites, and they are all better, i'll go where its worth helping.
2011-11-02 [Annie]: All heddate sites use the same priv system.
2011-11-02 [sammie h!]: But with some of them if you just ask nicely you get them, like on most sites I have priv 94 and 90 and one 89, the way you are using it, they don't. If the member knows how to use it, let them use it.
2011-11-02 [Veltzeh]: If the member doesn't specifically need a lower priv, there's no point in having a lower priv.
2011-11-02 [Ash]: If you follow that too many irresponsible people will be in charge. Veltzeh has the perfect point. When you get more active you may earn you a lower privilege of 99.
2011-11-03 [sammie h!]: No thanks, this isn't really my cup of tea, maybe you would have more members if you wasn't so tight on the rules and privs
2011-11-04 [Ash]: I'm sorry you feel that way but some people aren't responsible enough to handle certain items. We don't need thousands of members, we kind of prefer it to be a tight knit group, we're maybe looking for a few good writers. If that's not your cup of tea that's not our problem.
2011-11-09 [sammie h!]: I do write, but I write for fun and pleasure, there is no point in having a site if your keeping it tight
2011-11-23 [Annie]: This conversation is closed. Future comments on the issue will be removed.
2011-11-24 [Annie]: Sammie h, personal attacks aren't tolerated on WC. Consider this your first warning.
2011-11-29 [sammie h!]: Its not a personal attack, its the truth, and its a question
2011-11-29 [Annie]: This is your second warning.